Direct mp4 download or play: Ham Radio Jammers 5-24-2017
Finally, I’m starting to have somewhat better shortwave reception on my software defined radio. Here we have some foul-mouthed hams going at it on 3840 kilohertz, lower sideband.
Here is a recording featuring multiple radio receivers. The shortwave sounds were received on my Regency WT-4 multiband tube radio. The Citizens Band (CB) sounds were received on my General Electric 3-5814 CB transceiver. The scanner radio was most likely my Bearcat 300. The AM radio sounds (mostly KGO, San Francisco) were probably from a stereo component tuner, possibly a Marantz Model 23. The ham radio jammers on 146.82 mhz were up to their usual hijinks by playing tape loops “pull your pants down” and “knock that stuff off” etc. and then they start talking about Jesus Christ. The person singing on CB was another highlight. I recorded this onto my Superscope C-104 monaural cassette recorder sometime in the early 1980s at my home in Martinez, California.
I can’t remember how I mixed the audio, but I may have used a passive (potentiometers and resistors) home-brew line level mixer. Capturing the audio was done by playing the cassette on my Sony TC-D5M (Dolby NR off) connected to my Yamaha MG10/2 mixer and then to my PC running Windows 7 Home Edition with a Creative Audigy 4 Pro soundcard. I used VST Host (see bottom picture) to create a .wav file and Adobe Audition to slightly adjust and edit the audio. Then I picked a single (left or right) channel and saved it as a monaural .wav file. Lastly, the monaural .wav file was changed to a monaural mp3 at 128kbps using the LAME encoder and RazorLame.
Regency WT-4 Multiband Tube Receiver
General Electric 3-5814 CB Transceiver
Marantz Model 23 Tuner
Bearcat BC300 Scanner
This is the VST capture setup showing the input on the limiter set to plus 2.8 db, to more closely match the output of the Yamaha mixer and the peak limiter was set to minus .5db. The master levels are all set to plus .1 db only because after moving the level off of zero db they would not set back to zero, using the mouse. As you can see, peak levels of minus .4db were reached, which is exactly .1 db different from the limiter. I doubt if I could have been that precise with any analog setup. I will say that analog sound probably has better fidelity, in the long run. But remember, that is a matter of opinion.
This is a recording from the early 1980s (possibly December 1981) of mischievous amateur radio operators (hams) that like to have a lot of fun while talking on their radios. On this recording, I used my Bearcat 300 scanner radio at my home in Martinez, California to receive the 146.82 MHz repeater located in the hills of Berkeley, California. The scanner audio was fed to the line input of my Shure M67 mixer and the mixer line out connected to line in on my Superscope C-104 Cassette tape recorder.
Many times these amateur radio operators would play the audio of broadcast stations, and other amateur stations and tapes. Quite often they would make strange noises, not identify their call-signs, use foul language, and make other amateurs upset. I could go on, but if you listen to this and my other recordings of ham radio jammers, I suspect that it will make quite clear what jamming is all about. Incidentally, this tape is fairly clear of really extreme foul language except for an occasional sexual reference. Maybe it’s because the jammers are discussing religion. Be sure to click here “Ham Radio Jammers” or in the right hand column of this page for more.
Here is the other side of the C-90 cassette tape, “Ham Jammers Early 1980s #1.” This was possibly recorded days before. I used the same setup, except starting at 26:28 (counting down a voice says: “Who are you tryin’ to kid huh one watt uh? How about switching your amplifier on and off huh.” I switched from the Patrolman 4 radio to my Bearcat scanner for the remainder of the tape. The reception on the Patrolman radio was quite noisy during that session, so I decided to switch to the scanner which would be quieter. The audio quality on the scanner has reduced high frequency response, due to the fact it receives in narrow FM only. Narrow FM allows for channels to be closer together and is less likely to suffer from interference from adjacent channels. At about 10:20 to 9:13, (counting down) one of the operators briefly mentions hearing a recording of jammers on KPFA. That was likely me playing a recording I had made earlier. By the way, if I heard it correctly, the ham operator said the person on KPFA said “jammers unite” and that he was “K2GOR.” Funny, I don’t remember saying such a thing and I am not a ham radio operator either.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, I became interested in receiving and recording different types of radio communications. One of the first radios I used was the Realistic Patrolman 4. I thought it was pretty good, because it even had a squelch control. I remember listening to the Contra Costa County Sheriff, Martinez Police, (155.880 MHz before they went to UHF) BART trains, and early mobile phones, (when they were analog and on VHF) and several paging companies. Unfortunately the reception was not good, because the selectivity on the VHF low and high bands is so wide that many signals overlap and become unlistenable.
The one exception was a very strong signal at 146.820 MHz. In addition there were no other strong signals near this frequency. The reception on 146.820 MHz was as good as listening to an FM broadcast channel like KPFA at 94.1 MHz. By the way, at my house in Martinez, California, there were only three VHF signals on my Patrolman 4 radio that were consistently good. Those would have KDFM in Walnut Creek at 92.1 MHz, KPFA in Berkeley, and an amateur radio repeater at 146.820 MHz. I later found out that the amateur station was located in the Berkeley Hills like KPFA, which is probably why the reception was so strong.
I listened to the amateur station regularly, and at first it seemed quite normal. The more I listened, the stranger it became. There was lots of joking, cursing, and playing recordings of other radio operators. They kept referring to “jamming.” This, of course, is the act of an operator deliberately transmitting or keying up their radio while someone else is talking. This would cause the conversation to become garbled, distorted, or completely blocked, depending on how strong the jamming signal was being received by the booster station or repeater. A repeater is actually a receiver and a transmitter working as one. In the case of this one, the amateur operators would transmit on 146.22 MHz, and the repeater would receive these signals and broadcast out at higher power on 146.82 MHz.
As you may have noticed, there is a difference of 600 KHz between what is known as the input and the output of a repeater. 600 KHz is a standard amount of separation for amateur repeaters, and is widely used throughout the United States. I decided to start recording this amateur station on a regular basis. I took the signal from the headphone jack on the Patrolman 4, (a10 ohm resistor across the output to simulate a load instead of headphones) and fed that into the line input on a Shure M67 mixer and then connected the output to the line in on my Superscope C-104 cassette recorder. This setup allowed a VU meter to monitor the recording.
Once I started recording these ham radio operators, known as “jammers,” I knew I was hooked. I regularly listened and recorded for years, and much of the stuff I got was absolutely outrageous. Negativland ultimately incorporated some of this material into their releases. “Jamcon84” and “A Big 10-8 Place” are notable examples of the use of ham radio jammers. There is a website here that appears to be where ham radio operators can talk about the times they had in the early 1980s, talking on the 146.82 repeater and more. There is also a ham radio club in the Los Angeles area, with a similar spirit to the group in the Bay Area. They have streaming audio of their repeater, and you can go here and here for more info. Go here to hear 147.435 live. Just one last thing, “amateur” and “ham” operators (as far as I know) are one in the same, with emphasis on the “ham” in the case of these guys.
Radio Shack Realistic Patrolman 4 multi-band receiver